In a surprising twist, a Chinese manufacturing company’s “race to employment” has sparked controversy, as employees were allegedly shown the exit door for failing to complete a grueling 5-kilometer run within 30 minutes.
In the bustling city of Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, Mr. Liu’s quest for a stable job led him to a mechanical parts factory. He skillfully maneuvered through practical tests involving electric welding and gas cutting, winning the coveted position. After shelling out his own money for a medical examination, Mr. Liu eagerly embraced his new role in the maintenance department. Little did he know that an arduous challenge still awaited him.
Shortly after joining the company, the unexpected twist surfaced – a long-distance running test. Colleagues warned him of the potential consequences, emphasizing that completing the 5-kilometer race in just half an hour was a make-or-break deal. To make matters worse, the test day witnessed scorching temperatures, peaking at a blistering 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit).
Pushing his limits, Mr. Liu began the daunting run. However, the relentless sun took its toll, and he started experiencing heat stroke-like symptoms after covering about 800 meters. Dejected but determined, he abandoned the race and returned to work. While no immediate repercussions followed, a disheartening notification arrived the next day – his probationary period had been deemed unsuccessful.
The unnamed company staunchly defended its stance, asserting that the 5-kilometer run within 30 minutes was a litmus test for a candidate’s “hard-working spirit.” However, Mr. Liu wasn’t ready to give in. He refused to accept this seemingly unfair practice and decided to challenge the company in court. He argued that he had not been informed of this physical fitness test requirement beforehand, so he deemed his termination illegal.
The saga continued in the Suzhou Intermediate People’s Court, where Mr. Liu’s determination found validation. The court ruled in his favor, ordering the company to pay him a compensation of over 7,000 yuan ($1,000). This verdict vindicated Mr. Liu and spotlighted the need for transparency in informing job candidates about all aspects of employment, questioning the practice of using physical fitness as a measure of one’s dedication and work ethic.
The “race to employment” incident serves as a compelling reminder that fair hiring practices and open communication are essential for a harmonious and just workplace. As Mr. Liu’s case proves, it only takes one brave individual to challenge the norm and pave the way for positive change.
