Societies and civilizations have been built upon different states of mind. However, the two main approaches to the school of thought revolve around the analytical and humanitarian state of mind. From lawmakers to aid workers and donors, everyone has a different policy when it comes to these two states.
As a result, people have always been drawn to arguments about which is better for the betterment of society. But the truth is neither one triumphs over the other as both are imperative to the progression of development. With that said, the following is an intricate analysis of two sets of people using the two schools of thought.
To understand why both are fundamentally important, let’s dig into the lives of a few revolutionaries in both fields.
Humanitarian Thinking Philosophy
There are a host of institutional humanitarian actions across the globe that are well represented by large non-profit organizations such as the UN. Their actions have had positive impacts since the end of the second world war and at the height of the cold war. Humanitarian actions here can be classified as saving lives while alleviating pain and suffering.
However, in recent times such instruments have been agents of foreign policy from host governments. Ultimately, humanitarians have picked up the mantle individually and furthered help to the human race.
Dr. Neil Hindman
Take the case of Dr. Hindman, a professor with over 130 mathematical research papers stemming from the 70s and 80s. His work put him in a very special and elite group of mathematicians.
As a mathematician, you would expect the doctor to adopt a logical approach in his school of thought. However, that is not the case as Dr. Neil Hindman was well documented, showing compassion and empathy to his students. Although he was responsible for revolutionary work in mathematics, he did an excellent job at mentoring African American students at Howard University.
Not only that, but the doctor went on a step further to becoming a dissertation and Ph.D. adviser to more African American students than anyone in recorded history. In addition, he was responsible for helping 13 African Americans attain their PhDs.
While these numbers may seem small, we must acknowledge the time and context in which this feat was accomplished. Few African Americans, both men, and women were pursuing higher education at the time, and even fewer were pursuing degrees. This was the case for other people from different ethnic backgrounds.
So, it is fair to say that humanitarians have an essential role that is not to be overlooked.
If you’re having challenges with your academic papers, it would be in your best interest to look for help, just as Dr. Neil Hindman’s students. If that is not an option, then you should consider buying research paper from top writing services. Besides, this will increase your chances of scoring a high grade.
Analytical Thinking Philosophy
Logical thinkers employ critical and rational thinking in their everyday lives. They incorporate problem-solving skills, observation, research, and interpretation to solve complex problems. They shape the very laws and policies that govern most of our societies.
As a critical thinker, you learn by trial and error. But ultimately, you are more than competent when it comes to analyzing a situation, topic, problem, or the achievement of long-term goals. This philosophy was made famous by Western countries. This revolution began in the early 20th century and is still present today.
Bertrand Russell
Born on February 2nd, 1970, Bertrand Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl Russell, is known for his outstanding work as a polymath. Relevant to this topic, Russell was a critical thinker who was known as a social critic and political activist. Together with Gottlob Frege, fellow colleague G. E. Moore and apprentice Ludwig Wittgenstein, they introduced the logical philosophy.
He set considerably high bars when it came to logic, set theory, and philosophy. He served in the government as a Member of the House of Lords-Lord Temporal. His thinking approach shaped the course of the second world war for Britain and the cold war that followed. He won a Nobel Prize where he championed the freedom of thought.
During most of his life, he championed political activism until his death. He wrote various world leaders on what he believed was the right approach to solving modern-day problems. Not only that, but he also took a humanitarian approach as he was a member of the British Humanist Association. He once said that thought is not free when the profession in question makes it impossible to make a living.
As remarkable as his contributions to Britain’s development during the neo-world war, it would be ludicrous to assume that his work triumphs over the work of Dr. Neil Hindman. Both are equally useful contributions that sought to solve communal problems through critical thinking and human empathy.
Conclusion
In life, what makes us human is not what we believe, or where we are from, it’s the ability to respect others’ beliefs and perspectives. We have different preferences, but that is precisely what gathers us. So, pitching one against the other will only add to our existing problems.
Besides, it is humanly possible to combine both schools of thought for the betterment of society. This was the case of Britain’s pioneer Bertrand Russell. Both approaches to thinking are vital in creating a society where individuals think and grow freely while shaking off greed and envy.
