A recent survey reveals a significant divide among Japanese companies regarding the adoption of artificial intelligence.
Under the supervision of Nikkei Research for Reuters, the survey conducted from July 3 to 12, included responses from roughly 250 out of 506 companies approached, all responding anonymously. Approximately 24% of these companies reported having already integrated AI into their operations, with 35% planning to do so. However, 41% of the respondents indicated no intention of adopting AI, showcasing the varying levels of enthusiasm for technological innovation across corporate Japan.
When asked about their reasons for implementing AI, 60% of respondents cited addressing a worker shortage, 53% aimed to reduce labor costs, and 36% sought to accelerate research and development. Despite these benefits, several challenges were noted. A manager at a transportation company expressed concern over “anxiety among employees regarding potential headcount reductions.”
Other obstacles included a lack of technological expertise, high capital expenditure, and concerns about the reliability of AI systems.
Cybersecurity also emerged as a significant issue in the survey. Fifteen percent of respondents reported experiencing cyberattacks in the past year, while 9% had business partners who were targeted. Among those affected, 23% experienced temporary business halts, and 4% suffered information leaks. To enhance cybersecurity, 47% of companies are outsourcing their defense measures, and 38% rely on in-house specialists.
The survey also included a bigger social issue: the law requiring spouses to use the same surname. This topic gained attention after the Keidanren business lobby recently urged the government to allow married individuals to keep their surnames. In the survey, 50% of respondents supported such a legislative change, while 11% opposed it. “The current system is hurting individuals’—and especially women’s—dignity and freedom,” noted a manager at a machinery firm. On the other hand, a manager at a non-ferrous metal manufacturer warned that allowing separate surnames could “weaken family bonds.”
When asked how changing the law would impact their business, 14% of respondents believed it would boost employee morale, and 10% thought it would aid in hiring efforts. The majority, 56%, anticipated no significant impact.
